CONCEPTUAL PLANS FOR BIODIVERSITY INFORMATION EXCHANGE/ANALYSIS
I. Most Urgent Needs For Biodiversity Information Sharing
II. Comparison of Conceptual Plans for Biodiversity Informatics: National Biological Information Infrastructure (NBII-2); Global Biodiversity Informatics Facility (GBIF), and National Collaborative Institute (NCI) for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Informatics
|
CHARACTERISTIC |
NBII-2 |
GBIF |
NCI |
|
Sponsor |
President’s Committee of Advisers on Science and Technology (PCAST): Panel on Biodiversity and Ecosystems |
Biodiversity Informatics Subgroup of Office of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Megascience Forum’s Working Group on Biological Informatics |
CENR Workgroup on Biodiversity and Ecosystem, Informatics |
|
Name of Proposed Project |
National Biological Information Infrastructure – the next generation |
Global Biodiversity Information Facility |
National Collaborative Institute |
|
Geographical Coverage |
USA with link to global biodiversity resources |
Global – OECD member support, access for all |
USA |
|
CHARACTERISTIC |
NBII-2 |
GBIF |
NCI |
|
Goal |
Development of an extensive and frequently updated environmental knowledge base which can evaluate alternative plans for managing biodiversity and ecosystems to optimize the union between the environment and the economy (Focus research on biodiversity and ecosystems information to promote use of that information in management decisions, in education and research and by the public. |
Development of an international mechanism to make biodiversity data and information accessible worldwide. |
Development of knowledge products of biodiversity and ecological information and on the standards and tools needed to deliver them. |
|
Suggested Funding Source |
US Federal Government with support shifting to other partners gradually, although a permanent government presence will be needed. |
Member countries to provide host institution, resource assistance, and/or other specific services; leverage effect as planned result of coordinated international action; existing funding levels within national/regional research programs can be redistributed according to new needs. |
Co-funded and supported in-kind by agencies and cross-sector partnerships. |
|
CHARACTERISTIC |
NBII-2 |
GBIF |
NCI |
|
Suggested Funding Amount(s) |
$40 million/yr for 5 years and maintenance after that for next generation NBII. $200 million annually (phased in over 3 years)in addition to current federal expenditures in the areas of biological economic and information science research and support for education. |
Combined value of in-kind services and direct payments to support GBIF secretariat of at least $2 M/year for four years. Greatest support from countries that have the greatest financial, scientific and technical capacities to do so (although access to all countries). Total five-year funding of "authority file" of $280 M. |
No specifics. |
|
Initial Funding priorities |
|
|
|
|
ORGANIZATIONAL ARCHITECHTURE |
|
|
Comment: Organizational details of all three plans, as presented in the documents, are compatible with each other, GBIF being the overarching organization with NBII-2 representing organization in one country (USA) with a connection to GBIF, and NCI representing one or more focuses (possibly a node or nodes) within the USA.. |
|
|
NBII-2 |
|
|
GBIF |
|
|
NCI |
|
|
OBJECTIVES |
|
|
NBII-2 |
|
|
GBIF |
An infrastructure to support knowledge discover for global biodiversity research including
|
|
NCI |
|
| III. Similarities In All Plans |
|

To Top of Page | USGS Policies and Notices